Gordon: Razumkov should specifically name who offers 100 thousand dollars for his “head”

The conflict between the Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada Dmitry Razumkov and the “servants of the people” must be resolved within the party, and if someone bribes the deputies to resign, then the head of parliament must give specific names and bring these people to clean water.

This opinion was expressed on the air of the Ukraine 24 TV channel by journalist Dmitry Gordon.

He recalled that Razumkov is a nominee of the “servants of the people”, this is part of the political force, and they must deal with this issue within the party.

“How did it happen that he has a different point of view? And so it happened, he probably has a different point of view. They have a lot of different points of view in the faction, because people came there in different groups. Where would they all be without Zelensky . But now they do not remember it, that he brought them there “, – Gordon.

The journalist also commented on the rumors that the MPs were allegedly offered money for Razumkov’s resignation. He believes that this should be dealt with and the names of who are buying up votes should be given.

“Dmitry Alexandrovich should also be more specific and say who offered whom 50 or 100 thousand dollars. You should be specific. . If they do not like it – withdraw it, this is a normal democratic procedure, “- said Gordon.

At the same time, he believes that Razumkov is not obliged to support all the team’s initiatives, if, for example, they are unconstitutional. Gordon cited as an example the meeting of the NSDC, of ​​which the speaker of the Rada is also a member.

“Several members of the NSDC say to me:“ Here we come, they bring us a folder with nothing in it and we have to vote on what basis? ”They don’t want to, they don’t vote (earlier Razumkov did not support sanctions against Medvedchuk’s TV channels. – Ed.) They say: “According to the law, according to the Constitution, sanctions can be imposed on Ukrainian citizens only for terrorism. Why should we impose sanctions against this group if there is no terrorism there. “This is normal, this is not the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in Soviet times, when they simply raised their hands,” the journalist added.

Razumkov’s conflict with the “Servant of the people”

• It all started after Dmitry Razumkov sent a bill on oligarchs to the Venice Commission. He agreed to do this at the request of the Ombudsman and all opposition factions, but refused a request not to do this to his native Servant of the People party.
• The first to “rebel” was the head of the “SN” faction, David Arakhamia, who first, in a commentary to journalists, ran into Razumkov, promising that he would have a conversation with the head of parliament. Then Arahamia continued to harshly criticize him on the air of the “Freedom of Speech Savik Shuster” program.
• Then, on the same program, Stefanchuk got down to business, who right there filed a complaint with Razumkov: they say that the speaker recently refused him a request to submit the bill on local referendums to the Venice Commission, and after a while he sent an oligarchic law there.
• Now it has come to the point that Razumkov may not be invited to the congress of the Servant of the People party in Truskavets. But if he does get there, then an unpleasant conversation awaits him there.

Read in more detail in our material what the “servants of the people” say about the possible resignation of the speaker of the Rada and what they think about the conflict between Razumkov and Arakhamia.

In addition, even in the Office of the President, they delivered an ultimatum to Razumkov, so that he could decide whether the speaker was with his party or with the oligarchs.