Steve Bannon, a close ally of former President Donald Trump, has been charged with “obstructing” congressional investigative powers, a clear message to other witnesses tempted to ignore commission of inquiry subpoenas parliamentary. The 67-year-old former adviser is being sued for refusing to testify and submit documents to the House of Representatives special committee investigating Donald Trump’s role in his supporters’ attack on Capitol Hill on January 6 .
“A piece of the puzzle”
This indictment “should send a clear message to all those who think they can ignore the commission or try to obstruct our investigation: no one is above the law,” responded Bennie Thompson, Democratic chairman of the commission. investigation.
Steve Bannon’s testimony is seen as essential because it is supposed to help understand what Donald Trump was doing before and during the assault. “He is a piece of the puzzle,” said Adam Kinzinger, one of the two Republican elected members of this Democratic-majority commission.
Despite his summons in mid-October, Steve Bannon did not appear before elected officials invoking the right of presidents to keep certain documents and discussions confidential. But according to the commission, this protection does not apply because Mr. Trump is no longer president and has never officially asserted this privilege of the executive.
A crucial role in the election of Trump
Steve Bannon, a low-key but very influential adviser, had played a crucial role in the election of Donald Trump by giving a decidedly populist turn to the Republican billionaire’s campaign in 2016, before being pushed out the following year.
He did not hold any official function on January 6 but appears to have discussed the protest with the president in the previous days, according to the commission of inquiry. He was notably part of the “crisis cell” led by advisers to Mr. Trump from a luxury hotel in Washington before and after the assault on the seat of Congress.
More than 150 witnesses
He faces between 30 days and a year in prison for each charge and will be tried in federal court. But the legal battle could take months or years, potentially undermining the investigation. A Republicans’ victory in the midterm parliamentary elections in November 2022 would also mark the end of the investigation.
The commission of inquiry, which has already heard from more than 150 witnesses, launched new summonses this week against relatives of the Republican billionaire, including his former White House spokesman Kayleigh McEnany or his advisor Stephen Miller.
“There are his comments of the day before January 6” which seem to indicate “that he knew what was going to happen”, added Adam Kinzinger, one of the two elected Republicans of this commission with democratic majority. “We want to know what he knew”.
On January 5, Mr. Bannon notably said on a podcast that “everything converges and it’s time to attack”. Another close to Mr. Trump, his former chief of staff Mark Meadows, also snubbed a summons to appear before the commission of inquiry on Friday. He invoked a court decision announced Thursday, which temporarily suspends until November 30 the transmission of internal documents from the White House to the parliamentary committee.
The former president had invoked the right of the executive to keep certain information secret. The documents in question include the files of former close advisers to Donald Trump as well as the daily newspaper of the White House, an account of his activities, trips, briefings and phone calls.
But for the commission of inquiry, President Joe Biden authorized the publication of the documents and Mr. Meadows is required to testify at the risk of being charged with obstructing the investigative prerogatives of Congress.
A “stolen” election according to Donald Trump
On January 6, thousands of Donald Trump supporters gathered in Washington as Congress certified Joe Biden’s victory. The former real estate mogul had addressed the crowd, hammering, baselessly, that the election had been “stolen” from him. Several hundred demonstrators then launched an assault on the temple of American democracy, sowing chaos and violence even in the hemicycle.
He was acquitted in February after a trial in Congress for “incitement to insurgency”.
As an entertainment author with over 7 years of experience, I bring a diverse background to my writing. I have a proven track record in the journalism industry. My expertise extends beyond writing, as I have experience producing video content for websites and social media platforms, offering a well-rounded perspective on the entertainment world
