Israel, the dark power? Israel, the dark creature of the UN from a gray past time? And now also the opponent of international law? Danger! Prejudices fail the perspective.
Israel is not the state of Netanyahu. It is the only active democracy in the region; It will free itself from the prevailing democracy.
This Israel is threatened. Fatah like Hamas unchanged the right to exist. Jassir Arafat’s announcement at the time as a PLO boss was never implemented; As the chief of Fatah, he stood against it.
And Mahmud Abbas, in the current conflict, confronted by Hamas, where he is now, said that as boss, he would never agree to the right to exist. How should a two -state solution become a reality?
Recommended editorial content
At this point you will find an external content selected by our editors, which enriches the article for you with additional information. You can have the external content displayed with one click or hide again.
I agree that the external content is displayed. This means that personal data can be transmitted to third -party platforms. You can find more information in the data protection settings. You can find this at the bottom of our page in the footer so that you can manage or revoke your settings at any time.
© dpa/EPA Jim Hollander
Keyword war: It is not a war in the conventional sense – Hamas is not simply a war -oriented party, is not a state, it is a listed terrorist organization. This is a serious difference.
Keyword settlements: Benjamin Netanyahu, when he came back to office, asked the PLO to suspend settlement construction for a few weeks as a sign of good will (by the way, one along the un recognized lines).
He agreed, and more: he expanded the stop, to months. During this time, the Palestinians should consult whether they do not recognize Israel. Then peace and everything would be possible tomorrow. Nothing like that. Nobody took Netanyahu at the word.
No, the Palestinians cannot make the state. At least not so far. That would also undermine the existence of the Palestinian autonomy, corruption and terror. Does anyone actually know how much money from the West has been branched off by Abbas and his followers?
Who can rule out the risk of repetition?
This is how the situation is: Israel has been attacked, the risk of repetition at Hamas must rule out. It has decided to do this in a soil offensive. Therefore, it has to fight until all hostages are back and the Hamas gave up weapons.
Israel will ensure that the population receives food and medicine in Gaza, but at the same time the distribution of the relief goods, Hamas is not able to finance and maintain its organization by selling the United Nations Aid Nations for Palestine refugees. The anti-Hamas demonstrations in Gaza, suppressed bloody, are symptoms of Hamas weakened by this strategy.
There can only be a political process and an armistice with an opponent who can or wants to live with it that the other person continues to pass on permanently. Therefore, this is possible with the PLO if it decides to do so and not with the Hamas and Islamic Republic of Iran, because both are convinced of the need to remove Israel theological-political.
With regard to this, Israel, as a democratic state, is particularly committed to international law: also in order not to offer any points of attack in this regard.
Source: Tagesspiegel
I work as a news website author and mostly cover the opinion section. I have been writing since I was a teenager, and have always enjoyed telling stories. I studied journalism at university and loved every minute of it. After graduating, I decided to move to London and take up a position with a Global Happenings. It has been an incredible experience, learning about all sorts of different cultures and meeting some amazing people. My goal is to continue learning and growing in my career so that I can provide readers with the best possible content.
