The League – and in particular that of the Governors of the North – does not give up the third term. And he is preparing to face, with Massimiliano Fedriga, the ‘match’ with the premier Giorgia Meloni. The president of Friuli Venezia Giulia will meet her at Palazzo Chigi, to recover the comparison skipped in Venice for the leader’s fever.
Ansa agency The M5S exceeds the limit of the two mandates, ex on the track – News – Ansa.it But three legislatures to the maximum. Toninelli: ‘The party of Conte’ (ANSA) The Northern League will try to unlock the crisis of his junta, in standby from Sunday after the withdrawal of the delegations of the councilors of the League and Forza Italia. Fedriga has canceled any institutional commitment, among the protests of the oppositions that ask that it reports to the Council. At the moment the option of a distrust seems more remote, more likely a reshuffle of council to remedy the crack. But on the horizon remains the most intricate node of the ban on mandates for governors who certainly do not go down to Luca Zaia, doge of Veneto. But not even to Maurizio Fugatti: in the evening the President of the Autonomous Province of Trento, with a decree, redistributes the skills between the councilors and takes away the delegates to Francesca Gerosa of Fratelli d’Italia, who was his deputy and councilor.
Instead, it continues to downsize Matteo Salvini. “If the center -right will give us reason, I will be happy because it will be necessary to make sure that the citizens choose”, he limits himself to saying in Foggia, one of the stages of his commitments as Minister of Infrastructure. Not surprisingly, stuck by journalists, he adds: “My days are full of anything else”. Words from which the balancers emerge in relations with the allies. Aware that it is difficult to snatch something, after the government challenged the Trentino law on the third term, with the no of the League to the Consulta. And knowing very well that the allies are much less sensitive to the issue.
The most final appears Forza Italia: it is a closed speech, the blue spokesman Raffaele Nevi says among the lines. “There are no changes as far as we are concerned”, convinced that the limit of the two mandates “for all regions, also with special statute”, serves. The forzista responds thus, indirectly, to the bank attempted by Fratelli d’Italia (pending the decision of the Constitutional Court that can be imagined will arrive no earlier than September and perhaps even beyond) and the most explicit opening made by the Minister of the Interior, Matteo planted. Confirm that “it is a legitimate discussion that will be composed in the political site” and recalls that there has been “the wide availability of all to separate the technical-legal question” from a wider and more political reflection. The President of the Senate, Ignazio La Russa in agreement: “I am not an absolutely contrary and even in the specific case, I think that a reflection is only positive”, is the measured comment of the ‘colonel’ of Fdi.
But that the true theme, more than Friuli, is Veneto is not a mystery, above all because in the earth firmly in the hands of Zaia we will vote in autumn. Just there the League base is more in turmoil: in addition to the fate of the doge, the (concrete) risk worries that there is not another league player in the running, but a candidate of Fdi. With the effect, therefore, to lose the rudder of the Venetian Roccaforte (and the consensus to the Salvini party), and mortgage the guide of Lombardy and Friuli, even if in the farthest 2028. But despite the well -advanced, it is precisely the League governor, Attilio Fontana, who admitted today: “A third term in Lombardy is one of the hypotheses I would certainly consider”.
Reserved reproduction © Copyright Ansa
Source: Ansa
I have been working in the news website industry for over 4 years now, first as a reporter and then as an editor. I enjoy writing about politics news and am also an author. I try to cover a lot of different angles when it comes to my articles so that readers can get a well-rounded understanding of the story.
